This article in Nature Communications
![]()
has this figure showing the phylogenetic relationship between "contemporary human populations and Neanderthals":
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
has this figure showing the phylogenetic relationship between "contemporary human populations and Neanderthals":
Basically, the contemporary "out-of-Africa" individual is in a suit and a bowler hat, and the individual of "purely African ancestry" looks like a thug.
How does something like this get published in a prestigious journal nowadays?
HT @JacobPhD